Everyone knows that many jobs do not fall into the "9-5" category. Our firm successfully represented a police officer who suffered a work related injury in his own garage. We were able to show that even though the officer was not at the police station or on patrol at the time of the accident, his injuries at home were a result of his employment and was covered under the Workers' Compensation Act.
Injured workers must show that the accident they suffered "arose out of" and was "in the course of" their employment. For an injury to "arise out of" employment, its origins must be in some risk connected with or incidental to the employment. For an injury to be "in the course of" employment, it must occur within a period of employment, at a place where workers may reasonably be in the performance of their duties, and while they are fulfilling those duties or engaged in something incidental to those duties. In short, "in the course of" refers to the time, place, and circumstances of the injury. In many situations, this burden is not difficult to prove.
At other times, however, the circumstances of the accident are more complex. This was the case for the injured police officer. The officer maintained a duty bag as party of his job. The office kept his helmet, gas masks, legal codes, ammunition, handcuffs, firearm, metal baton, and a flashlight in the duty bag. This bag weighed approximately 40 pounds. The officer kept the bag with him at all times for safekeeping. He would keep the bag in his garage when he was not on duty. The department allowed all officers to keep their duty bag with them when they were not on duty.
...